What Goes Around, Comes Around

Capital punishment is a topic that has been subject to much controversy and debate. It is viewed as a solution by some and as a menace by others. Across the globe many countries have repeatedly made laws which either implement or repeal capital punishment. There have been many speeches, cases and treatises written on the arguments for and against capital punishment. Certain segments of society view it as a necessary evil, by others view it as a barbaric form of punishment which should not have a place in civilized society of the 21st century. Even today, capital punishment can ignite much debate.

The camp which opposes capital punishment states that no person has the right to take away the life of another, irrespective of the gravity of the crime committed. Further, they state that rehabilitation and not retribution should be the rationale behind punishment. If you speak to a drug lawyer, they might tell you that those who are convicted and sentenced for the possession of abusive substances are those in need of rehabilitation. Further, a criminal law Adelaide might also tell you that certain people who are sentenced to capital punishment are those who are the mere paws of masterminds who manage to get away scot free. Moreover, there are those who oppose capital punishment on the grounds that it gives no time for those convicted to repent for the crimes they have committed. They are not given the time to make amends and they are not given the opportunity to realize the gravity of their wrongdoings. Thus, those who oppose capital punishment believe that taking a person’s life is not an effective or suitable means of punishment.

On the other hand, those who are in favour of capital punishment state that capital punishment is the most effective deterrent. They state that those who might contemplate committing a crime that is punishable by death, will think twice before taking the risk. Hence, the rate of crimes will decrease as those who consider committing those grave crimes would be deterred by the threat of capital punishment. Further, those who argue for capital punishment state the purpose of punishment is retribution and therefore that those who have committed crimes of such a grave nature should receive a harsh punishment. Thus, they would state the capital punishment is proportionate to the gravity of the crime they have committed. Further, others might feel that those who have committed crimes punishable by death should not be released into society as they can pose a threat to the wellbeing of society.